2011年9月21日水曜日

Reaction to Fisher

Together with yesterday's NP lecture, my understanding towards perception has changed. I thought that what I see everyday is the world itself. However, as Fisher claimed in the text, the world we perceive is not the world itself. After we perceived images physically from our eyes, it is interpreted and also evaluated in our mind. We are always depending on experiences in the past and our perception is always bothered by stereotypes Since we can not get rid of them, we unconsciously see the world in a selective way and it is always inaccurate. So we see the world as we "want" to see, and this makes us ignore some information. Now that I know I am perceiving the world inaccurately, I have to be critical and see the world clearly. 

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
In the NP lecture Michael showed us some tricks related to visual perception.
I found some interesting tricks on the Internet:

杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏
杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー杏マナー
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏
ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏ーナマ杏


アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画
アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画
アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画
アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画アロマ企画
画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア
画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア
画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア
画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア画企マロア 

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteres are at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a tatol mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

By the way, I think it is impossible to read the letter"11"as a capital "A" also "15" as a capital"C"(It is about the picture put in the last page of the text). Did anyone succeeded in reading it?

Tricks above is cited from:
http://trickart.seesaa.net/category/2923825-1.html
http://www.snopes.com/language/apocryph/cambridge.asp

2 件のコメント:

  1. interesting tricks!!
    i like the last one!! i could read and understand the sentesces with no problem( ̄ー ̄)

    返信削除
  2. The tricks are so interesting!!
    The lines are hanging awry.

    I understand that seeing is inaccurate.

    返信削除